Accuracy of a minimally invasive surgical guide in microsurgical endodontics: a human cadaver study


Submitted: 14 March 2021
Accepted: 11 May 2021
Published: 4 October 2021
Abstract views:
2111


PDF:
127
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Aim: In the last decade, endodontic microsurgery has achieved high qualitative standards and excellent success rates. Technology and highly innovative materials have reduced pre- and intra-surgical complexity. To date, operator experience continues to be an important prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of root resections achieved by two operators with different experience in endodontic microsurgery using a surgical guide.

Methodology: A comparative study was conducted on 40 roots (20 roots/operator) in two defrosted cadaver heads. Preoperative CBCT and intraoral scans were used to plan and manufacture a bony-supported surgical guide equipped with oriented steel sleeves and buccal flanges. Two operators with different levels of endodontic skills and abilities executed osteotomies and root resections. Planned and postoperative CBCT images were superimposed to measure the linear deviation of the surgical access point from the planned target. A t-test was performed to compare linear deviations from the planned target between experienced and non-experienced operators. Statistical significance was set at 5% (p<0.05). Maximum length of resected apex, periodontal ligament, and sufficient osteotomy to complete the root-end preparation and filling were qualitatively evaluated by a third experienced surgeon.

Results: Overall, the mean linear deviation was 1.23 ± 0.38 mm. No statistically significant differences emerged between operators, even in posterior teeth. All root resections were considered clinically successful.

Conclusions: Guided endodontic microsurgery is an accurate and unbiased method to execute apical access, even in posterior teeth, and is not subject to the surgeon's experience.


Stefano Gaffuri, University of Brescia, Dental School, Department of Medical and Surgery Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health

 

 

 

Elisabetta Audino, University of Brescia, Dental School, Department of Medical and Surgery Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health

 

 

 

Matteo Salvadori, University of Brescia, Dental School, Department of Medical and Surgery Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health

 

 

 

Maria Luisa Garo, University of Brescia, Dental School, Department of Medical and Surgery Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health

 

 

 

Stefano Salgarello, University of Brescia, Dental School, Department of Medical and Surgery Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health

 

 

Gaffuri, S., Audino, E., Salvadori, M., Garo, M. L., & Salgarello, S. (2021). Accuracy of a minimally invasive surgical guide in microsurgical endodontics: a human cadaver study. Giornale Italiano Di Endodonzia, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.02.36

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations