Application of artificial intelligence in a visual-based fluid motion estimator surrounding a vibrating Eddy tip

Submitted: 17 December 2021
Accepted: 24 January 2022
Published: 2 May 2022
Abstract views:

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


  • Harry Huiz Peeters Laser Research Center in Dentistry, Bandung, Indonesia.
  • Faber Silitonga Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Bandung Institute Technology, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
  • Lavi Zuhal Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Bandung Institute Technology, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

Aim: To improve our initial understanding of the vibrational behavior and fluid flow of an EDDY®  tip when irrigation is activated using artificial intelligence (AI).

Methodology:A straight glass model was filled with a solution containing 3% NaOCl. A-28 mm polymer noncutting #20 4% taper file was driven by an air sonic handpiece at 6,200 Hz for five seconds. The fluid flow behavior was visualized using a Miro 320S high-speed imaging system (Phantom, Wayne, NJ, USA). The recordings of the hydrodynamic response were then analyzed using motion estimation program, supported by LiteFlowNet.

Results: Rapid fluid flow was visualized clearly in the model when activated by an air sonic driven EDDY®  tip. The distal end of the EDDY® tip generated a near-wall high-gradient velocity apically in all directions of the oscillation.

Conclusions: The proposed motion estimation program, supported by LiteFlowNet, could perform flow estimation of a non-PIV experiment in detail.

Martin H. Ultrasonic disinfection of the root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 1976;42:92–99.

Cunningham WT, Martin H. A scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal debridement with the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 1982;53:527–531.

Cunningham WT, Martin H, Forrest WR. Evaluation of root canal debridement by the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 1982;53:401–404.

Sabins RA, Johnson JD, Hellstein JW. A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short-term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod. 2003;29:674–678.

Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J. 2004;37:672–678.

Jensen SA, Walker TL, Hutter JW, Nicoll BK. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod. 1999;25:735–738.

Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercade M, et al. Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:1–6.

Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LW. Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal. J Endod. 2010;36:143–146.

Koch JD, Smith NA, Garces D, Gao L, Olsen FK. In Vitro Particle Image Velocity Measurements in a Model Root Canal: Flow around a Polymer Rotary Finishing File. J Endod. 2014;40:412–416.

Koch JD, Jaramillo DE, DiVito E, Peters OA. Irrigant flow during photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:381–386.

Robinson JP, Macedo RG, Verhaagen B, et al. Cleaning lateral morphological features of the root canal: the role of streaming and cavitation. Int Endod J. 2018;51:e55–e64.

Raffel M, Willert C, Kompenhans J. Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. 1st ed. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1998.

Stepen. Development, Evaluation and Application of Image Processing Code for Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (DPIV). MA thesis. Indonesia: Institut Teknologi Bandung. 2011

Octavianus, F. Development of Multi-Processing Python-based Stereoscopic Digital Particle Image Velocimetry. Bachelor’s Thesis. Indonesia: Institut Teknologi Bandung. 2018.

Cun YL, Matan O, Boser B et al. Handwritten zip code recognition with multilayer networks. IEEE. 1990;2:35–40.

Hui TW, Tang X, Loy CC. LiteFlowNet: A Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network for Optical Flow Estimation. IEEE. 2021;43:2555–2559.

Cai S, Liang J, Gao Q et al. Particle Image Velocimetry Based on a Deep Learning Motion Estimator. IEEE. 2020;69:3538–3554.

Shan T, Tay Fr, Gu L. Application of artificial intelligence in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2021;100:232–244.

Orhan K. Bayrakdar I.S. Ezhov M. et al. Evaluation of artificial intelligence for detecting periapical pathosis on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Int Endod J. 2020;53:680–689.

Zheng Z. Yan H. Setzer F.C. et al.Anatomically constrained deep learning for automating dental CBCT segmentation and lesion detection. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2021;18:603–614.

Hiraiwa T. Ariji Y. Fukuda M. et al. A deep-learning artificial intelligence system for assessment of root morphology of the mandibular first molar on panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:1–7.

Aminoshariae A, Kullid J, Nagendrababu V. Artificial Intelligence in Endodontics: Current Applications and Future Directions. J Endod. 2021;47:1352–1357.

Murphy M, Killen C, Burnham R et al. Artificial intelligence accurately identifies total hip arthroplasty implants: a tool for revision surgery. Hip Int. 2021 Jan 8; ([Epub ahead of print])

Butler DJ, Wulff J, Stanlet GB, Black MJ. A naturalistic open source movie for optical flow evaluation. Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, Part IV. 2012. pp. 611–625.

Geiger A, Lenz P, Stiller C, Urtasun R. Vision meets Robotics: The KITTI Dataset. Int J Robot Research. 2013;32:1231–1237.

Thomson WT. Theory of Vibration with Applications. 4th ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 1972.

Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TJ, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. J Endod. 1987;13:490–499.

Kuah HG, Lui JN, Tseng PSK, Chen NN. The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer. J Endod. 2009;35:393–396.

Chopra S, Murray PE, Namerow KN. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer. J Endod. 2008;34:1243–1245.

Mir M, Gutknecht N, Poprawe R, Vanweersch L, Lampert F. Visualising the procedures in the influence of water on the ablation of dental hard tissue with erbium : yttrium-aluminium-garnet and erbium,chromium : yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser pulses. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:365–374.

Octavianus F. Visual-based Fluid Motion Estimator with Deep Learning, Thesis Magister Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung. 2021.

Peeters, H. H., Silitonga, F., & Zuhal, L. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence in a visual-based fluid motion estimator surrounding a vibrating Eddy tip . Giornale Italiano Di Endodonzia, 35.


Download data is not yet available.