https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2023.37.01.09

Immunohistochemical analysis of Biodentine versus MTA in repair of furcation perforation: an animal study

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2023)
Submitted: 18 November 2022
Accepted: 26 January 2023
Published: 2 March 2023
biodentine , furcation perforation, MTA, new bone formation, osteonectin
Abstract Views: 620
PDF: 192
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Mahmoud M. Badr
Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Future University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ashraf M. Abu-Seida
ashrafseida@cu.edu.eg
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5466-2016
Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Ahmed H. Hashem
Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Salma H. El Ashry
Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Aim: This study compared Biodentine (BD) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA Angelus) in repair of furcation perforation (FP) in terms of inflammation and new hard tissue formation.

Methodology: Ninety six teeth in six adult mongrel dogs were divided into two equal groups (48 teeth/3 dogs each) according to the time of repair; immediate and delayed repair of the induced FP. These groups were divided into three subgroups (16 teeth each) according to the evaluation period; 1, 2, and 3 months. Each subgroup was further subdivided into four subdivisions according to the FP repair material used; MTA Angelus (6 teeth), BD (6 teeth), negative control (2 teeth) and positive control (2 teeth). Instrumentation, obturation and FP were performed in the experimental and positive control teeth. The perforations were sealed according to the groups and subdivisions. Histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis using Osteonectin antibodies were performed for assessment of the inflammatory cell count and new hard tissue formation. All data were statistically analyzed.

Results: In all groups and subgroups, there were no significant differences between MTA and BD in the inflammatory cell count and new hard tissue formation (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to MTA Angelus as a FP repair material, Biodentine induces similar degree of inflammation and new hard tissue formation.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

Badr, M. M., Abu-Seida, A. M., Hashem, A. H., & El Ashry, S. H. (2023). Immunohistochemical analysis of Biodentine versus MTA in repair of furcation perforation: an animal study. Giornale Italiano Di Endodonzia, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2023.37.01.09
Copyright (c) 2023 Mahmoud M. Badr, Ashraf M. Abu-Seida, Ahmed H. Hashem, Salma H. El Ashry Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.