Apical preparation size after repetitive pecking to the working length using different endodontic file systems


Published: 20 February 2019
Abstract Views: 311
PDF: 177
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • Tousif Iqbal Nathani Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Aatif Iqbal Nathani Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, India.
  • Ankur Mahesh Banode Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, India.
  • Moez Ismail Khakiani A/64, Yuwan Apts, 413/414 Mount Mary Rd, Bandra W., 400050 Mumbai, India.
  • Juan Gonzalo Olivieri Fernandez Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Fernando Duràn-Sindreu Terol Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Francesc Abella Sans Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine and evaluate the apical preparation size resulting from different pecking times to the working length (WL) with five different file systems. Materials and methods: Fifty standard simulated endodontic J-shaped blocks were instrumented using ProTaper NEXT (PTN), WaveOne (WO), WaveOne Gold (WOG), OneShape (OS) and the Self- Adjusting File (SAF) (n = 10) with different pecking times (1, 2 and 4) to the WL. For the SAF group, instrumentation was done till WL according to the time, i.e. 1, 3 and 4 min. On completion of each stage, silicone impression material was used to take canal impressions for comparison and evaluation of the apical size preparation, using a stereomicroscope. Two-way analysis of variance was applied to determine differences between groups and pecking times. Results: After four pecking times, a significant increase was observed in the apical diameter of four test groups compared to SAF (P < 0.05), which was not associated with increased apical preparation at all times. Conclusion: A greater apical enlargement occurs with increasing pecking times; however, SAF instrumentation exhibits the minimum changes in the apical preparation after 1, 3 and 4 min. WO, WOG and OS are able to prepare the apical size similar to their tip at a single peck to the WL.


Nathani, T. I., Nathani, A. I., Banode, A. M., Khakiani, M. I., Fernandez, J. G. O., Terol, F. D.-S., & Sans, F. A. (2019). Apical preparation size after repetitive pecking to the working length using different endodontic file systems. Giornale Italiano Di Endodonzia, 32(2), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.32067/gie.2018.32.02.07

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations